Here's the
latest from the International Chamber of Shipping regard Somalia piracy. There certainly is a tone of frustration, with real cause. It does seem incredible that the international community seems so impotent to stop this. Of course the international community is also largely to blame for the situation emerging - recall that it was only after fish stocks were devastated by mostly European fishing fleets that fishermen turned to piracy. And it was only after these small scale efforts proved so lucrative did organised crime take over.
I also have to wonder how much western meddling was responsible for the collapse of the state of Somalia itself; i need to do a little more reading on it.
Of course the world needs to deal with this situation, of course the world needs to give Somalia a hand's up out of anarchy. I could give a fiddler's fart for the shipping companies themselves, but the seamen and women who sail the Indian Ocean are now at risk, and although few lives have been lost so far, as ships arm themselves the stakes will rise. And don't kid yourself; if the shipping companies continue to lose money this way, they will start taking the law into their own hands. The last paragraph in the press release above is frightening in it's implications:
“It is extraordinary that governments today seem less able to protect shipping than they were almost 200 years ago.” 200 years ago, when a pirate was sighted by a man-of-war, they were blown out of the water, no quarter given. The reverse was often the case when a merchantman was taken by pirates. Do we want to return to the days of wholesale slaughter on the seas?
I've been having strange dreams of late: I've often drempt that I'm back in university again, retaking classes that I've taken before in an attempt to improve my marks. But in those dreams I'm doing quite poorly, and not getting anywhere. It's like I'm afraid to advance to the next level of my education such as a Masters or PhD, just languishing in what I've already done at the bachelor's level. And now last night I had a disturbing dream of doing the same, but this time I'm bombing high school, failing courses that I completed decades ago! Talk about going backwards in life.
I'm not one to interpret dreams as I don't believe they are literal. But I do pay attention to the feelings that emerge from them, and in this case they are a certain sadness and fear, a gnawing awareness that life is passing me by.
I doubt that there is any path without wonders and doubts. For every path we choose there is a myriad of others that are then closed to us, and it is only human to wonder what those others would have offered. In most cases there isn't a right and wrong way to do life; there are choices and each choice results in an outcome. Some outcomes we prefer to others, but who can say which one is the better, especially when we cannot really know what the other option would have been like?
I've often told my children that no matter what choice you make you will learn and grow from the experience. The only "wrong" choice is to stay still, to do nothing.
When I look at my values, when I look at my needs, my life has been awesome. I've done so much in the last 1/2 century, even if from the outside there isn't much in evidence. And I suspect that that is part of the difficulties I'm having at this stage of my life - very little externally in terms of power, status, and material wealth to show for it, to remind me of where I've been.
Paradoxically, none of that has any lasting or intrinsic meaning, so I suspect that those who have chosen more well-trodden paths likely also share the same doubts as mine. One of the great things about being human is that none of us are unique - whatever you feel you can assume that miilions of others feel it as well, no matter how bizarre or unique you believe your experience to be.
Looking back I wouldn't have done it any different; all the major choices I made were right for me at the time. But now? Where do I go from here? There are no shortage of challenges that a fellow can take on, but it's not a matter of choosing challenges for the sake of them, but choosing ones that take you closer to your "destiny" whatever the hell that is.
I'm getting a sense it's about achieving more external things, but having already walked down that path and found it wanting, I wonder if I'm not just experiencing garden-variety existential anxiety. "
for you are dust, and to dust you shall return” is more than a comment regarding the ubiquitousness of our material nature; it's an assertion that all we
do is ephemeral and ultimately meaningless.
Despite what the media says, despite what is assumed by the greater culture, despite the values thrown at us day after day, my gut tells me that it is
who we are that counts, rather than
what we do.
Some may have an issue with that, as how can we know who someone
is without seeing what they
do. And if you will judge someone, shouldn't it be according to what they do, rather than what they say, intend, or carry hidden inside themselves?
The problem lies in the judgment itself. Who's to say that it is required that you be able to see what is in my heart? Our legal system is based on evaluating the significance of human behaviour, but that is simple a social order issue, and not what I'm talking about. What's at stake here is not the orderly functioning of society, but the purpose of human existence.
We judge saints according to their deeds. We look for selflessness, kindness, compassion, humility, and service. Jesus is the model for much of the Western world.
And yet we are dust. Everything we do turns to dust. No matter what you do, no matter what you provide society or civilisation, it all carries on as if you never were. People love and kill, people are born and die, we all struggle for meaning, we all try to overcome our limitations. Banting and Best saved so many people with their discoveries, they ended so much suffering, and yet suffering carries on, and countless individuals still die. One plague ends and another rises. Nations rise and fall, and so do civilisations, no matter how powerful or ancient.
Dust in the wind. And so if we accept that, what we
do is ultimately irrelevant. But because I don't believe that
we are irrelevant, that life is meaningless, that what we
are is of absolute, utmost importance.
I think it comes down to not wanting to engage in "good" or admirable behaviour, but to struggle to
become "good", and probably the behaviour will reflect that in ways that others will approve. Good behaviour on it's own is almost meaningless because it's just as easily a manifestation of things other than enlightened spirit -poor self esteem, a deep need to be liked, a need to be accepted, a need for praise, a need to be hidden. While no doubt others can take advantage of it, it's still false and manipulative and at it's core, a lie.
I suspect the world would be a much better place if people struggled as hard to "be" good as they did to have good behavior (which is socially and culturally contingent). An enormous part of my life has been spent struggling towards this, but I have soo very far to go. Perhaps that's why I feel stuck. Perhaps I need to change my life in a way that puts this even more paramount. It's an intriguing notion, although I have no idea what that looks like.
I've talked before about goal setting, and yes there are very concrete ways to go about achieving things. But the real concern is not how to get something, but what to get, and why, and what that means. That is such a very important question.
Come sail with us. www.selfdiscoverysail.com
Sailing the Broughtons last year
Swimming in Cowichan Bay. The water was 75 degrees F!

Brentwood Bay sunset
East Sooke Park
Taking the girls for a drive in the country.

Come sail with us. www.selfdiscoverysail.com